On Warlocks: Cynwise’s journey to the heart of warlockery concludes

by on May 21, 2012


Some time ago, noted Warlock blogger Cynwise decided to write a two-part article about the decline of Warlocks in Cataclysm.

No-one predicted what would follow.

His original article became a massive, multi-part, thirty thousand word treatise that we’ve linked to twice already and compared to no less than Hunter S. Thompson’s quest for the American Dream.

And with some justification. This is an astonishing treatise, filled with both original research and insights born of years of play and a personal struggle with the game and class he loves.

Now, it’s finished, and it finishes on an up note, as Cynwise looks into the Warlock in the upcoming WoW expansion Mists of Pandaria, and discovers that a brave new world awaits -

“I find it ironic that I named this series after Gibbon’s masterpiece, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Gibbon assembled a wealth of material around the collapse of Roman governance in Western Europe in the third through sixth centuries, but he used it to formulate a monocausal theory – that the Roman Empire’s fall was inevitable because of the influence of Christianity. This theory overlooks much in pursuit of forwarding an Enlightenment viewpoint of the Medieval period and Christianity as bad, and the Greco-Roman classical tradition as good.

As a historian, I have always preferred the works of J. B. Bury, who did not dispute the evidence Gibbon presented, but rather interpreted them differently. Bury posits that Rome’s fall was not inevitable, but rather the result of a series of incidents which lead to a catastrophe. Internal political pressures, external migratory pressures on the Germanic tribes, inflation, increased taxes to deal with the Sassanid Empire’s threat, a series of terrible decisions by Imperial and Provincial leaders alike – all these contributed to the calamity of the fourth and fifth centuries. I recommend reading Gibbon so you’ve read him, but I recommend Bury if you want to see the vast scope of problems in Late Antiquity, and how monocausal theories need to take them all into account.

To quote Bury:

The gradual collapse of the Roman power … was the consequence of a series of contingent events. No general causes can be assigned that made it inevitable.

It’s my hope that this series has been more like Bury than Gibbon. While there has been a central theme to this work – inelegant complexity without reward led to the decline of Warlock populations in Cataclysm – it is my firm belief that it was a series of design decisions and balance changes during the expansion which contributed to the decline of this class. Attributing it to any one specific change misses the big picture. Our personal reasons and agendas need to take a back seat to the data.

The Warlock class declined in Cataclysm. Based on what I’ve seen so far in the Mists of Pandaria Beta, it is too early to write its epitaph, but its recovery is by no means a certain thing. It is transforming into something very different what came before, and it is my sincere hope that it flourishes and thrives in its new incarnation.

Let’s see what the future holds for this great class.

Cynwise has also helpfully indexed all of the Decline and Fall series in one place.

If you haven’t read these pieces already, and if you’ve got even a passing interest in Warlocks, game design, or why some classes work and others don’t, I’d strongly recommend taking the time to read through it – particularly “The Loss Of The Warlock’s Soul”, which squares the circle of game mechanics versus the fantasy a game presents better than any other article I’ve read.

We’re not an accredited institution over here, sadly – because if we were, we’d definitely be awarding Cynwise a Doctorate if not a Professorship of MMO writing for this astonishing magnum opus.

Go read.

If you enjoyed this article, check out our other posts from these categories: World of Warcraft

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Cynwise May 22, 2012 at 2:16 am

Thank you, Hugh. Really – this a lot to me. I don’t know what comes next, but I know it’s not going to be anything like this series was. Maybe I’ll just do lolcats for the next few months, my brain needs a break after this.

I think it might be easier for me to grind out my Professor title via archeology next time. :)

Reply

Katarnas May 22, 2012 at 11:04 am

As someone who doesn’t dps (ever) and who has only one class that has never been above level 10 (warlock) I have to say that this has been a most excellent series of article and I have eagerly awaited each and every installment. It has been a truly amazing read and some of the insights and thoughts you have provided have even made me contemplate playing a warlock in MoP. O.o

Kat

Reply

Cynwise May 25, 2012 at 6:02 pm

Thanks, Kat. Give the class a whirl in Mists – I don’t know if it will click with you or not, but it will be getting complete overhaul and is worth the wait. :)

Reply

TwiceStruck May 23, 2012 at 11:15 pm

I love this article because so many times Blizzard’s patches and tweaking have made a class that was lovable into unplayable abominations. Not every nerf, or every counter buff is a good one. We should not accept the ones that destroy a classes playability, or ones that takes a classes unique skills or spells and spreads it amongst other classes, just to equalize or dumb down the game.

I feel cata has done what George Lucas has done with Starwars, and the longer we put up with the abuse the more horrible things will happen. Seriously why can DKs and Locks battle rez now? How does this fit into their characters and why has Blizzard removed the useful portals that connect east and west continents from all the cities?

This article is just scratching the surface of lots of errors that blizzard has made or is currently making.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: